4 thoughts on “Who is better about anti -virus software MSE and Avast?”
Dewey
It is recommended not to use Avast, it seems to be the Czech things, it can also be seen that the strength is not enough. It basically supports free use. This software, and often poisoning, can't prevent much at all. It's not as good as those of domestic antivirus software. MSE is better, and the ability to check and kill is okay. I tried it once, and even the hidden and unwavering things in a cracked version of the game program were checked and killed, and the other ones were reported normally.
LS, who tells you that Avast is basically free to use? His family version can register to the registration code through the official website, you think he was originally a free thing? Look at the avSat on the official website, 400 people names, names of people names, names for 400, names of people names, 400 people. If you look at the price in the enterprise version? From your argument, the higher the price, the more NB? Then you look at the anti -virus software of CA, the price is high enough, what about the anti -virus strength? Can you write good software like a country like the United States? I have used Avast for more than two years, why do n’t I see often poisoning? When I help people install the machine, the poisoning is basically a domestic soft machine. How to explain it? Kill virus software is not a hundred at all. What about killing all the virus and leaking a few times? The little red umbrella with the highest detection rate will leak poison. What is strange? Rising often coexist with the virus. So which one is not like it, it is trial, it is trial, it is trial. Come out. Let's take a look at the results of AVAST in the test of AV-TEST and VB100?
Have you used Avast on the second floor? Is the Czech stuff insufficient? fallacy! avast can match NOD32 in Europe! You haven't used it, but just listening to others, you don't know what suggestions do you give? Some people, he will poison what you install for him, is it the fault of anti -virus software? However, when speaking, MSE's anti -virus ability is really good, but this can only be used on the genuine system, and the function is less than Avast. Avast's webpage monitoring is a must.
It is recommended not to use Avast, it seems to be the Czech things, it can also be seen that the strength is not enough. It basically supports free use. This software, and often poisoning, can't prevent much at all. It's not as good as those of domestic antivirus software.
MSE is better, and the ability to check and kill is okay. I tried it once, and even the hidden and unwavering things in a cracked version of the game program were checked and killed, and the other ones were reported normally.
LS, who tells you that Avast is basically free to use? His family version can register to the registration code through the official website, you think he was originally a free thing? Look at the avSat on the official website, 400 people names, names of people names, names for 400, names of people names, 400 people. If you look at the price in the enterprise version? From your argument, the higher the price, the more NB? Then you look at the anti -virus software of CA, the price is high enough, what about the anti -virus strength? Can you write good software like a country like the United States? I have used Avast for more than two years, why do n’t I see often poisoning? When I help people install the machine, the poisoning is basically a domestic soft machine. How to explain it? Kill virus software is not a hundred at all. What about killing all the virus and leaking a few times? The little red umbrella with the highest detection rate will leak poison. What is strange? Rising often coexist with the virus. So which one is not like it, it is trial, it is trial, it is trial. Come out. Let's take a look at the results of AVAST in the test of AV-TEST and VB100?
Have you used Avast on the second floor? Is the Czech stuff insufficient? fallacy!
avast can match NOD32 in Europe! You haven't used it, but just listening to others, you don't know what suggestions do you give? Some people, he will poison what you install for him, is it the fault of anti -virus software? However, when speaking, MSE's anti -virus ability is really good, but this can only be used on the genuine system, and the function is less than Avast. Avast's webpage monitoring is a must.
MSE is said to be 99%
avast! It may be almost available, but the protection is good
is recommended to be Avast! Bar the new thing to be a little white mouse