5 thoughts on “Many companies now have group noodles when recruiting. Is the group noodles abused?”
Nathan
Pay attention to the transformation of body language: body language is one of the most important points that the interviewer's most focused on the discussion of the leadership group. The body language is the item that you cannot cover it. Immediately reflect the depths and overall strength of your heart. "The head and neck" are full of mistakes. Learning funny, learning and communication, and nodding nods well is the best posture that reflects your high quality. Speaking proactive: Speaking in the discussion of no leadership group, active initiative to have a lot of opportunities to reflect their ability to work. If the speech is very small or does not speak, most of them have no opportunities. In the general discussion of the general leadership group, the interviewer pays a lot of attention to a lot of attention The people who spew more speeches. In the process of discussion of the specific non -leadership group, many people will choose to be silent or very little speaking because they encounter powerful companions. This is all shifting. If you do n’t speak, the interviewer has no way to see your overall strength, it is obvious that it is not easy to give you opportunities. does not need to cut off your companion's speech: I have discussed the speech of the non -leadership group to avoid taboo cutting off the companion, similar to "I'm really sorry, let me break" must not be said to such statements. It seems that there is no team spirit. You can't respect the opinions of others. In the case of others' speeches, you only wait for his speech, or find a suitable breakthrough person, and then go to the explanation. I want to be a college student who has just stepped into the society. Natural and unfair work, this unfairness does not depend on how much use value you have created, you should get the benefits of equal. Not to mention that as long as my employees want to come to you to work, you have to accept me. The association between the company and the employees is just like the love of men and women. Boys chase girls, heavy mountains, girls chase boys, laminate gauze. Back to the question itself, is the group face exposing private information? I think this must be broken up. The question of the interviewer is whether it has infringed personal privacy, and there is no chance of a single layer or group. Instead, it depends on the problem that the problem is actually related to the recruitment position. Because many job seekers are recruiting interviews with this at the same time, the interviewer feels that it can be more unique to the job seekers, and then select the optimized job seeker. However, it is not sufficient to be admitted to those with the highest excellent rate. Because many interviewers generally appear to participate in the group, some interviewers suggest that they will have key effects. In the end of the recruitment interview, the remaining five people left together, and one of the job seekers told me, "I think you are very deep, very reasonable, and see it. The trial officer is particularly interested in you, and you may be very appointed. At that time, I immediately told the job seeker, "If you understand the group method early, I cannot participate in the recruitment interview. Anyone who chooses to make people is not a key position. Even if I admit me, I am not easy to come.
I think it is definitely not. Because there are too many people who apply for jobs now, the on -site interview will waste time, so I will choose this high -efficiency group.
Pay attention to the transformation of body language: body language is one of the most important points that the interviewer's most focused on the discussion of the leadership group. The body language is the item that you cannot cover it. Immediately reflect the depths and overall strength of your heart. "The head and neck" are full of mistakes. Learning funny, learning and communication, and nodding nods well is the best posture that reflects your high quality. Speaking proactive: Speaking in the discussion of no leadership group, active initiative to have a lot of opportunities to reflect their ability to work. If the speech is very small or does not speak, most of them have no opportunities. In the general discussion of the general leadership group, the interviewer pays a lot of attention to a lot of attention The people who spew more speeches. In the process of discussion of the specific non -leadership group, many people will choose to be silent or very little speaking because they encounter powerful companions. This is all shifting. If you do n’t speak, the interviewer has no way to see your overall strength, it is obvious that it is not easy to give you opportunities.
does not need to cut off your companion's speech: I have discussed the speech of the non -leadership group to avoid taboo cutting off the companion, similar to "I'm really sorry, let me break" must not be said to such statements. It seems that there is no team spirit. You can't respect the opinions of others. In the case of others' speeches, you only wait for his speech, or find a suitable breakthrough person, and then go to the explanation. I want to be a college student who has just stepped into the society. Natural and unfair work, this unfairness does not depend on how much use value you have created, you should get the benefits of equal. Not to mention that as long as my employees want to come to you to work, you have to accept me.
The association between the company and the employees is just like the love of men and women. Boys chase girls, heavy mountains, girls chase boys, laminate gauze. Back to the question itself, is the group face exposing private information? I think this must be broken up. The question of the interviewer is whether it has infringed personal privacy, and there is no chance of a single layer or group. Instead, it depends on the problem that the problem is actually related to the recruitment position. Because many job seekers are recruiting interviews with this at the same time, the interviewer feels that it can be more unique to the job seekers, and then select the optimized job seeker. However, it is not sufficient to be admitted to those with the highest excellent rate. Because many interviewers generally appear to participate in the group, some interviewers suggest that they will have key effects.
In the end of the recruitment interview, the remaining five people left together, and one of the job seekers told me, "I think you are very deep, very reasonable, and see it. The trial officer is particularly interested in you, and you may be very appointed. At that time, I immediately told the job seeker, "If you understand the group method early, I cannot participate in the recruitment interview. Anyone who chooses to make people is not a key position. Even if I admit me, I am not easy to come.
Of course, it is not abused, because now this is a trend, many people like to use this popular group, which can also see a person's reaction ability.
I don't think the group noodles are abused, because the group noodles can save a lot of interview time, and test the teamwork ability of job seekers.
I think it must be abused, because online interviews often cannot reflect the real situation of the interviewer.
I think it is definitely not. Because there are too many people who apply for jobs now, the on -site interview will waste time, so I will choose this high -efficiency group.