5 thoughts on “It is urgent to help friends apply for legal aid, very urgent”
Blanche
Recently, some players sued the Warcraft of Jiucheng Agent . The player won the last case. This case is very similar to yours. Contact . I also hope that you can give me the score of the reward
The case: Yesterday morning, the online game "World of Warcraft" player Zhou Xujun in the Jiutong case finally used the plaintiff End of the victory. The Pudong Court made a first -instance judgment, requiring Shanghai Jiucheng Information Technology Co., Ltd. to restore the game characters and all equipment under the player account, and bear the cost of litigation.
Player acting lawyer Cai Jing said that the victory of the case is a successful challenge of players to online game providers and service providers, which is of great significance in maintaining the rights of players. Because there are many irregularities in the current legal rights protection in the field of online games, this case will have hope to regulate these unfair behaviors in a certain sense, and the rules of the industry may also change.
On March 7 this year, player Zhou Xujun suddenly discovered that the World of Warcraft accounts that have been operating for many years suddenly could not enter, and then he learned that his game account had been publicly announced by Jiucheng, which meant that he Multiple game characters and virtual property in this account have been turned into black.
The explanation of Jiucheng said that the reason for Zhou Xujun was because of illegal use of the game BUG to make a profit. The BUG is a gaming vulnerability discovered and widely used by the player in the game copy. Nine City has repeatedly warned that it was prohibited but the effect was not good. To this end, a large number of players, including Zhou Xujun, were permanently frozen by Jiucheng. But players have objections about this. Zhou Xujun believes that the game BUG and the right to interpret all are online game companies. He played the game according to the content provided by the game without knowing it. What Jiucheng should do is to repair the bug as soon as possible, not blindly blocking the player account.
It repeated negotiations, Zhou Xujun brought Jiucheng to court. The Pudong Court finally believed that the network service contract signed by the player and the game company was binding on both parties. The game bug is a vulnerability for programming, which is due to the negligence of the game provider's development and design. If it thinks that there is a bug in a certain scene, it can terminate the scene or repair the bug. The court ruled that Jiucheng resumed the player's game characters and equipment when the player was still in use when he knew that he had prohibited the BUG.
1. I personally think that if some people are redeemed normally, the amount is not large. It should not be blocked.
2, if the player usually recharges normally, at this time, then it can be identified as brush
3, as to the case of 2, if the registered agreement has an agreement, , Then process
4 according to the agreement, but because it is caused by a vulnerability in the system, not the player, it is necessary to treat it differently. You can negotiate with the recharge evening. n, 5 Generally speaking, the player still makes sense. The game provider is not fully based.
Didn't there be a criminal case that Xu Ting had collected money in the past two years, which was a bit similar. This use of the withdrawal machine program error, 1 yuan can be taken for 1,000 yuan, and 170 in the card is taken out of 170,000. It was sentenced to life imprisonment afterwards because the property was theft. Later, after the media exposure and lawyers, they were sentenced to five years in prison.
You friends are much lighter than him. The use of BUG cannot prove it intention. The appearance of the second bug is not predicted by players. Essence
It's legal point of view, your friend is reasonable.
I think the practice of game companies is not appropriate. But your friend may involve an improper profit. In fact, the best way should be to restore the recharge according to the normal proportion.
usually 1: 100, 1: 900 that day, why did you find abnormalities? What do you think will be? Don't tell me, you don't know anything. In fact, you also found abnormalities, so you quickly go to the value.
The two parties have been wrong, negotiated, and cannot be negotiated. In this matter, do you go to the court to sue?
It is unreasonable, but if the player deliberately uses a bug to brush money, it will inevitably be named. . The game company's approach is a bit wrong, just go back to the file. You can call and communicate well with the perfect company. If you talk, then use legal weapons to solve
Recently, some players sued the Warcraft of Jiucheng Agent
. The player won the last case. This case is very similar to yours. Contact
. I also hope that you can give me the score of the reward
The case:
Yesterday morning, the online game "World of Warcraft" player Zhou Xujun in the Jiutong case finally used the plaintiff End of the victory. The Pudong Court made a first -instance judgment, requiring Shanghai Jiucheng Information Technology Co., Ltd. to restore the game characters and all equipment under the player account, and bear the cost of litigation.
Player acting lawyer Cai Jing said that the victory of the case is a successful challenge of players to online game providers and service providers, which is of great significance in maintaining the rights of players. Because there are many irregularities in the current legal rights protection in the field of online games, this case will have hope to regulate these unfair behaviors in a certain sense, and the rules of the industry may also change.
On March 7 this year, player Zhou Xujun suddenly discovered that the World of Warcraft accounts that have been operating for many years suddenly could not enter, and then he learned that his game account had been publicly announced by Jiucheng, which meant that he Multiple game characters and virtual property in this account have been turned into black.
The explanation of Jiucheng said that the reason for Zhou Xujun was because of illegal use of the game BUG to make a profit. The BUG is a gaming vulnerability discovered and widely used by the player in the game copy. Nine City has repeatedly warned that it was prohibited but the effect was not good. To this end, a large number of players, including Zhou Xujun, were permanently frozen by Jiucheng. But players have objections about this. Zhou Xujun believes that the game BUG and the right to interpret all are online game companies. He played the game according to the content provided by the game without knowing it. What Jiucheng should do is to repair the bug as soon as possible, not blindly blocking the player account.
It repeated negotiations, Zhou Xujun brought Jiucheng to court. The Pudong Court finally believed that the network service contract signed by the player and the game company was binding on both parties. The game bug is a vulnerability for programming, which is due to the negligence of the game provider's development and design. If it thinks that there is a bug in a certain scene, it can terminate the scene or repair the bug. The court ruled that Jiucheng resumed the player's game characters and equipment when the player was still in use when he knew that he had prohibited the BUG.
1. I personally think that if some people are redeemed normally, the amount is not large. It should not be blocked.
2, if the player usually recharges normally, at this time, then it can be identified as brush
3, as to the case of 2, if the registered agreement has an agreement, , Then process
4 according to the agreement, but because it is caused by a vulnerability in the system, not the player, it is necessary to treat it differently. You can negotiate with the recharge evening. n, 5 Generally speaking, the player still makes sense. The game provider is not fully based.
6, negotiate first, if not, you can sue.
Didn't there be a criminal case that Xu Ting had collected money in the past two years, which was a bit similar.
This use of the withdrawal machine program error, 1 yuan can be taken for 1,000 yuan, and 170 in the card is taken out of 170,000. It was sentenced to life imprisonment afterwards because the property was theft. Later, after the media exposure and lawyers, they were sentenced to five years in prison.
You friends are much lighter than him. The use of BUG cannot prove it intention. The appearance of the second bug is not predicted by players. Essence
It's legal point of view, your friend is reasonable.
I think the practice of game companies is not appropriate. But your friend may involve an improper profit. In fact, the best way should be to restore the recharge according to the normal proportion.
usually 1: 100, 1: 900 that day, why did you find abnormalities? What do you think will be? Don't tell me, you don't know anything. In fact, you also found abnormalities, so you quickly go to the value.
The two parties have been wrong, negotiated, and cannot be negotiated. In this matter, do you go to the court to sue?
It is unreasonable, but if the player deliberately uses a bug to brush money, it will inevitably be named.
. The game company's approach is a bit wrong, just go back to the file.
You can call and communicate well with the perfect company. If you talk, then use legal weapons to solve